Image

Accountability - the Good, the Bad and the Balanced

Oct. 16, 2015
When preparing your personal and professional leadership goals, consider the good, the bad and the balanced in terms of accountability.

Make no mistake about it, accountability in leadership is an essential ingredient in the seasoning that flavors every successful company on the planet. The proportion of accountability in relation to everything else in the recipe determines if your blend is organizationally exquisite or if it causes those who taste it to cringe.

Accountability in its purest form is a good thing. Ideally, it crafts a sense of direction, purpose and achievement. The issue is often that we as leaders do not perform a self-check on the amount and type of accountability we are levying upon our organizations. Key factors to success in this area are awareness and sensitivity about how much is too much or too little and when the formula is just right.

A bad mixture of accountability encourages your organization to quietly revolt and initiate a blame game culture because there is too much or too little of a good thing.

In the case of too much accountability, fear is king and denial is queen. When both fear and denial rule, the empire is destined to fall to paralysis, inefficiency, bad news sheltering and obscurity about what is actually happening.

In the case of too little accountability, entitlement is king and ineffectiveness is queen. When these two rule, the empire is also destined for failure due to hot potato passing, rumor mill building, missed commitments and ultimately loss of customer confidence.

A balanced mixture of accountability encourages your organization to self-impose it. Eager hands will raise on their own, claiming responsibility for undesired process outputs, for missteps, for strained customer relations and resulting loss of business.

A balanced mixture is good for an organization because it allows team members to make mistakes and to learn from them. A balance mixtured of accountability also encourages the unilateral sharing of lessons learned and fosters continuous process enhancements.

Achieving the right mix requires keen leadership focus on identifying opportunities to coach and mentor. The ideal formula requires a higher level of awareness that there is a bandwidth of balance ultimately needed to reach maximum efficiency.

There are two common types of accountability: Externally-imposed and self-imposed.

Wall Street is an example of externally-imposed accountability. In fact, Wall Street is a reactive accountability delivery device. It is the entity that has no enforcement authority within the corporate veil, yet it is bestowed the highest levels of the influence by the entities whose performance it monitors.

Demanding customers, company leaders and colleagues are also examples of externally-imposed accountability delivery devices. While externally-imposed accountability drives performance and is an integral ingredient for business success, it alone will not encourage the creation and sustainment of high performance teams.

Self-imposed organizational accountability is a major milestone for effective leaders in this regard. There are few leadership accomplishments that can top the infusion of self-imposed organizational accountability where all team members positively accept responsibility for their work and consistently meet each other’s commitments.

When preparing your personal and professional leadership goals, consider the good, the bad and the balanced in terms of accountability. Explore how you can ignite and spice up the team in the same way a master chef creates an amazing dining experience time and time again.

About the Author

J. A. Rodriguez | J.A. Rodriguez Jr., CSP

J.A. Rodriguez Jr., CSP, ASP, is a Director on the Strategic Advisement Team at the Board of Certified Safety Professionals and the CEO of Make My Day Strategies LLC. He has led record-breaking and award-winning EHS teams while supporting $7B annually in business across 100+ countries. Rodriguez was honored to be selected by EHS Today as one of "The 50 People Who Most Influenced EHS in 2012-2013" and "2014 - 2015.” He also is an empowering and international keynote speaker, entrepreneur, a patented inventor, an engineer, a certified safety professional, author of the book "Not Intuitively Obvious – Transition to the Professional Work Environment" and co-editor of the American Society of Safety Engineers’ book “Consultants Business Development Guide.” Dare to think differently.

Sponsored Recommendations

10 Facts About the State of Workplace Safety in the U.S.

July 12, 2024
Workplace safety in the U.S. has improved over the past 50 years, but progress has recently stalled. This report from the AFL-CIO highlights key challenges.

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!