AROUND THE NATION

Jan. 1, 2008
TexasRehearing of Workers' Comp Case Requested A decision passed by the Texas Supreme Court on a high profile case has labor groups and state Congressional

Texas
Rehearing of Workers' Comp Case Requested

A decision passed by the Texas Supreme Court on a high profile case has labor groups and state Congressional leaders seething as they claim the ruling, which limits injured contract employees to workers' compensation benefits without the ability to pursue legal action, allows negligent companies to escape consequences.

Four Texas lawmakers, along with the Texas AFL-CIO, drafted a brief arguing the decision in the Entergy Gulf v. Summers case this past August contradicts state law. The United Steelworkers (USW) union argued that the decision “rewards negligent employers who fail to maintain a safe workplace.”

In 2001, John Summers was injured in an accident while working at Entergy's Sabine Station plant as an employee of a contractor hired by Entergy. Along with his worker's compensation claim, he tried to sue the company for negligence. The Texas Supreme Court overturned an appellate ruling in his favor, establishing that Entergy — the “premises owner” — also qualified as a “general contractor.” Because Summers was covered by workers compensation purchased by Entergy, the company was immune from injury lawsuits, the ruling said.

Minnesota
Illness Plagues Pork Plant Workers

An inexplicable neurological illness has afflicted 11 workers from a pork processing plant in Austin, Minn., prompting state health officials to investigate the cause of the malady.

According to officials from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), the workers experienced muscle weakness and numbness as well as an “abnormal sensation” in their muscles and legs. While some of the workers have recovered completely, others are currently going through rehabilitation, said Health Commissioner Dr. Sanne Magnan. She also said that an investigation into the cause of the illness is still underway.

Face masks have been issued for workers to wear and the company no longer uses a method called “air pressurized removal” to remove brain tissue from the animals, Wadding said. He assured that the general public is not at risk and the food distributed by the plant has not been affected.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Committing to Safety: Why Leadership’s Role in Safety Excellence is Key

Jan. 13, 2025
Leadership has the power to transform an organization through their behavior and vision, which can result in the creation of an organizational culturethat supports safety excellence...

Speak Up! Cementing "See Something, Say Something" to Drive Safety

Jan. 13, 2025
Many organizations promote "see something, say something" to encourage their people to intervene and make work safe. But most don't go far enough to equip teams with the skills...

The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease

Jan. 13, 2025
DEKRA announces its latest white paper, “The Truth and Challenges of Cultivating Chronic Unease,” as a definitive look into why being vulnerable to incidents strengthens our commitment...

Mitigating Risks: Strategies for Safeguarding Workers in Hazardous Workplaces

Jan. 13, 2025
Join our expert team in taking on the challenge to make safety part of your organization’s DNA as work, the workforce, and workplaces evolve.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!