$1.3 Million Enforcement Settlement for Clean Water Act Violations

May 30, 2002
The United States reached a settlement with Boston Sand and Gravel (BS&G) Co. and two of its subsidiaries to resolve claims that the companies violated the federal Clean Water Act at several facilities.

A civil complaint was also filed with the consent decree.

Under the consent decree signed by the Environmental Protection Agency, BS&G, Ossipee Aggregates Corp.and Southeaster Concrete Inc., BS&G will pay a civil penalty of $897,983 to resolve the government's claims. BS&G will also complete a supplemental environmental project (SEP) that will cost the company $445,000. The SEP is a wastewater recycling project at BS&G's Charlestown, Mass., facility. The project is designed to reduce discharges of wastewater and conserve potable water by recycling waste concrete slurry.

After being informed of the government's civil enforcement action BS&G made considerable effort to achieve compliance at its facilities. The consent decree requires BS&G to maintain company compliance with the Clean Water Act in the future. The consent decree also requires the company to conduct multi-media compliance audits at its Massachusetts facilities. Additionally, BS&G has agreed to develop a comprehensive environmental management system that will identify potential environmental problems and correct them before they occur.

"EPA found significant Clean Water Act violations by Boston Sand and Gravel, the most serious at its Charlestown facility which is in the Charles River Basin," said Robert Varney, regional administrator of EPA's New England Office. "With this consent decree the company is showing not only a willingness to correct the problems but also to prevent pollution in the future."

The civil complaint alleges the following violations of the Clean Water Act at facilities located in Charlestown, Everett, Weymouth and South Boston, Massachusetts:

  • BS&G's Charlestown facility discharged truck wash water containing waste concrete material into the Millers River without a proper permit; failed to properly monitor and report for process wastewater discharges at its permitted outfall; discharged storm water without a permit; failed to monitor and report for storm water; and failed to amend its storm water pollution prevention plan.
  • At a facility in Everett, Ossipee discharged storm water to the Island End River and the Mystic River without a permit; failed to complete an adequate storm water pollution prevention plan; and failed to complete a timely and adequate spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plan.
  • At a facility in Weymouth, Southeastern discharged storm water to tributaries of the Old Swamp River without a permit and failed to complete a timely and adequate storm water pollution prevention plan.
  • At its South Boston facility, BS&G failed to complete a timely and adequate spill prevention, control, and countermeasure plan.

"We considered these to be serious violations which warranted a significant penalty," stated U.S. Attorney Michael Sullivan. "The water resources of this commonwealth are a precious resource that deserve vigorous protection. Companies who get caught violating the federal Clean Water Act can expect to face stiff consequences."

The most significant violations occurred at BS&G's Charlestown facility. The complaint alleges that the company repeatedly discharged process wastewater that had extremely high levels of pH, a corrosive, into the Millers River without a permit. "This high pH posed serious risks to wildlife, both birds and aquatic organisms, in the Millers River," said Varney.

The Millers River is part of the Charles River basin and BS&G's Charlestown facility is located within several hundred feet of both the Millers and Charles rivers. Making the Charles River fishable and swimmable by Earth Day 2005 is a major priority for EPA New England.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!