Groups Tell EPA Diesel Rule Cannot Wait

Feb. 16, 2001
A broad coalition of clean air groups and truck manufacturers are asking for an immediate end to delays by the Bush\r\nAdministration in finalizing the diesel fuel rule.

'

A broad coalition of clean air groups and truck manufacturers on Tuesday pleaded for an immediate end to delays by the Bush Administration in finalizing a rule to make heavy trucks and buses 95 percent cleaner by 2006.

The coalition asked EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman to make clear that the new administration did not intend to rewrite the agency''s diesel rule published in January.

"This could be the first big environmental test of Whitman and the entire administration," said Frank O''Donnell, executive director of the Clean Air Trust, an interest group.

President George W. Bush issued an order on his first day in office to block some last-minute executive orders and rules laid down by outgoing President Bill Clinton.

Bush also issued a 60-day delay on regulations that were published in the Federal Register -- including the diesel rule -- but had not yet taken effect.

Clean air activists said delays in the rule would extend health problems -- like asthma and lung cancer -- to more Americans which result from breathing air polluted by belches of smoke commonly seen from 18-wheeler highway trucks and city buses.

Manufacturers said they want the rule so they can plan for the future, and build cleaner machines to use cleaner diesel.

Environmentalists are wary of the Bush team''s approach to their causes, like clean air and protecting wilderness, but pointed out repeatedly that the diesel rule was supported by more than just green groups.

"The American Lung Association and the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers never before have stood together supporting the same rule," said O''Donnell.

Late last year, the Clinton Administration released the diesel rule, aimed at cutting emissions from both diesel engines and the levels of harmful sulphur in the fuel.

Proponents say the rule would prevent 8,300 premature deaths each year, 5,500 cases of chronic bronchitis and some 360,000 asthma attacks.

Trucks and buses would be up to 95 percent cleaner than models now used, making future vehicles as clean as those which run on natural gas today.

The petroleum industry has complained about both the timing and the extent of a requirement to cut sulphur in diesel to 15 parts per million (ppm), 97 percent below current levels.

The National Petrochemical & Refiners Association (NPRA) filed a lawsuit on Feb. 9, to force changes to the rule, arguing it needs until 2008 to 2010 to make costly refining changes.

NPRA is arguing that the industry cannot make extreme sulphur reductions in diesel right on top of that for gasoline sulphur.

NPRA noted that a study by Charles River Associates showed that the EPA rule would cause a 12 percent yearly shortage in diesel supply when implemented.

by Virginia Sutcliffe

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Navigating ESG Risk in Your Supply Chain

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover the role of ESG in supply chains, from reducing carbon footprints to complying with new regulations and enhancing long-term business value.

Best Practices for Managing Subcontractor Risk

Sept. 26, 2024
Discover how to effectively manage subcontractor risk with unified strategies, enhanced oversight, and clear communication for consistent safety and compliance.

Fitting in Fast: Making a Safe Workplace for New Hires

Sept. 12, 2024
Over a third of nonfatal injuries happen to workers who have been with their current employer for less than a year.

Top 10 Causes of Distracted Driving—and What They All Have in Common

Aug. 27, 2024
The results reveal the top ten causes of distracted driving, and make it clear that not all distractions are created equal.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!