Bush Administration Sits Out Debate On New Chemical Safety Rules

Nov. 15, 2001
Worried that the chemical industry is not doing enough to guard against terrorist attacks on high-risk chemical facilities, Sen. Jon\r\nCorzine, D-NJ, has introduced a bill that would lead to tough new federal regulations.

'

Worried that the chemical industry is not doing enough to guard against terrorist attacks on high-risk chemical facilities, Sen. Jon Corzine, D-NJ, has introduced a bill that would lead to tough new federal regulations.

Where the Bush administration stands on Corzine''s Chemical Security Act of 2001, is not clear.

In a move that clearly riled Democrats, neither EPA Administrator Christie Whitman nor Attorney General John Ashcroft chose to accept the subcommittee''s invitation to testify at a hearing held yesterday on the measure. Nor did anyone else from the two agencies show up to speak on their behalf.

But Senate Republicans and chemical industry representatives made it clear they oppose S.1602 during a hearing held by the Subcommittee on Superfund, Toxics, Risk and Waste Management.

"Let the debate begin," said Sen. Robert Smith, R-NH, the ranking Republican on the subcommittee and a moderate on environmental issues.

"The debate has already started," retorted Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who chairs the subcommittee and is a cosponsor of S. 1602.

Key provisions of Corzine''s bill:

  • Require the EPA to work the Department of Justice (DOJ), state and local agencies to designate within one year high priority categories of chemical manufacturers and transporters;
  • Give the EPA and the DOJ an additional year to develop safety regulations for these companies;
  • Give the EPA and the DOJ the power to issue administrative orders to reduce the threat of potential attacks on high-risk chemicals;
  • Impose criminal penalties on owners and operators of chemical sources who knowingly violate the Act.

Smith said he opposed the bill because be believed cooperating with industry would lead to better security than would the adversarial approach entailed by new regulations. He also rejected provisions that would require chemical companies to install safer designs and maintenance practices.

But perhaps the most controversial piece of the bill is the possibility that owners and operators could go to prison for failing to comply with the Act.

"This bill puts the government in the role of managing chemical companies, and puts managers in the role of preventing terrorism," Smith complained. "It would be a crime to be a victim of a crime."

Corzine defended the bill, saying he has taken a cooperative approach with industry, and that imposing criminal liability for gross negligence is standard practice.

He also referred to a DOJ study conducted last year - before the Sept. 11 attacks - that there is "a real and credible threat" that terrorists would try to cause an industrial chemical release in the foreseeable future.

Boxer noted that she had invited industry representatives as well environmentalists and industry watch-dog groups like the Working Group on Community Right-to-Know to testify at the hearing.

The chair of the subcommittee then fired a shot across the bow of Whitman, when it was disclosed that in its efforts to deal with chemical security so far EPA has met only with the chemical industry.

"If the administration doesn''t meet with all sides," Boxer warned, "its approach won''t meet with the kind of reception here it deserves." Frederick Webber, president of the American Chemistry Council (ACC), contended that his industry is taking many voluntary steps to improve security and that Corzine''s bill "was not the right vehicle to take us where we need to go."

But Democrats noted that the voluntary security measures taken by the airline industry failed to prevent the attacks of Sept. 11.

"Sometimes the bottom line gets in the way of people doing the right thing," said Corzine.

Stay tuned to Occupationalhazards.com for continuing coverage of the growing controversy over the nation''s chemical security, including the Bush administration''s response to the threat, ACC''s voluntary guidelines to improve security, and the arguments of environmentalists that there are big holes in the nation''s chemical safety laws.

by James Nash

About the Author

EHS Today Staff

EHS Today's editorial staff includes:

Dave Blanchard, Editor-in-Chief: During his career Dave has led the editorial management of many of Endeavor Business Media's best-known brands, including IndustryWeekEHS Today, Material Handling & LogisticsLogistics Today, Supply Chain Technology News, and Business Finance. In addition, he serves as senior content director of the annual Safety Leadership Conference. With over 30 years of B2B media experience, Dave literally wrote the book on supply chain management, Supply Chain Management Best Practices (John Wiley & Sons, 2021), which has been translated into several languages and is currently in its third edition. He is a frequent speaker and moderator at major trade shows and conferences, and has won numerous awards for writing and editing. He is a voting member of the jury of the Logistics Hall of Fame, and is a graduate of Northern Illinois University.

Adrienne Selko, Senior Editor: In addition to her roles with EHS Today and the Safety Leadership Conference, Adrienne is also a senior editor at IndustryWeek and has written about many topics, with her current focus on workforce development strategies. She is also a senior editor at Material Handling & Logistics. Previously she was in corporate communications at a medical manufacturing company as well as a large regional bank. She is the author of Do I Have to Wear Garlic Around My Neck?, which made the Cleveland Plain Dealer's best sellers list.

Nicole Stempak, Managing Editor:  Nicole Stempak is managing editor of EHS Today and conference content manager of the Safety Leadership Conference.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!