Construction Industry Appeals Voluntary Ergonomics Standard

Nov. 30, 2007
On Nov. 9, trade groups representing commercial and residential builders appealed the American National Standards Institute’s (ANSI) voluntary ergonomics standard for the construction industry.

The American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE) oversaw the process that led to ANSI’s adoption of the standard, ANSI/ASSE A10.40-200X, for final review on June 4. The voluntary standard offers resources to prevent musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) and encourages training and use of protective equipment and engineering controls. Its suggestions include offering breaks and job rotation for repetitive tasks and allowing employees to work with items at waist height to avoid bending over.

The construction industry appeal, however, stated that there is no scientific evidence to support the need for the standard or evidence that the standard could prevent MSD injuries, and calls for the standard’s “immediate withdrawal.”

Voting Process was Flawed, Construction Industry Says

According to the appeal, the committee that voted 76 percent in favor of the standard did not represent a consensus because it was stacked with pro-ergonomic members. The appeal also claimed the process was flawed by “fatal procedural deficiencies.”

“It strains credulity to assert that a voluntary consensus standard exists in the face of opposition by the construction industry employers,” the appeal said, and added that some of the issues “are so contentious they do not lend themselves to the development of consensus standards.”

About half of all ANSI voluntary standards are later used to support or create federal rules. The industry may be concerned that OSHA might model a future rule based on the ANSI standard, or may begin citing employers for ergonomics infractions because of the standard.

Furthermore, if a Democrat is elected president in 2008, it could mean the return of a federal ergonomics standard; most Democratic candidates currently support preventing workers from ergonomic-related injuries. Construction companies were exempt from the ergonomics rule imposed by the Clinton administration.

An appeal decision is expected in February 2008.

About the Author

Laura Walter

Laura Walter was formerly senior editor of EHS Today. She is a subject matter expert in EHS compliance and government issues and has covered a variety of topics relating to occupational safety and health. Her writing has earned awards from the American Society of Business Publication Editors (ASBPE), the Trade Association Business Publications International (TABPI) and APEX Awards for Publication Excellence. Her debut novel, Body of Stars (Dutton) was published in 2021.

Sponsored Recommendations

Free Webinar: ISO 45001 – A Commitment to Occupational Health, Safety & Personal Wellness

May 30, 2024
Secure a safer and more productive workplace using proven Management Systems ISO 45001 and ISO 45003.

ISO 45003 – Psychological Health and Safety at Work

May 30, 2024
ISO 45003 offers a comprehensive framework to expand your existing occupational health and safety program, helping you mitigate psychosocial risks and promote overall employee...

DH Pace, national door and dock provider, reduces TRIR and claims with EHS solution

May 29, 2024
Find out how DH Pace moved from paper/email/excel to an EHS platform, changing their culture. They reduced TRIR from 4.8 to 1.46 and improved their ability to bid on and win contracts...

Case Study: Improve TRIR from 4+ to 1 with EHS Solution and Safety Training

May 29, 2024
Safety training and EHS solutions improve TRIR for Complete Mechanical Services, leading to increased business. Moving incidents, training, and other EHS procedures into the digital...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!