Image

OSHA Orders Trucking Company to Withdraw 'Retaliatory Lawsuit' Against Whistleblowers

Oct. 24, 2013
The agency also has ordered Palumbo Trucking to pay the whistleblowers $60,000 and take other corrective actions.

OSHA said it has ordered North Branford, Conn.-based Palumbo Trucking Inc. and owner David Palumbo "to withdraw a retaliatory lawsuit filed against two former workers of the commercial motor carrier who raised safety concerns."

The agency also has ordered Palumbo to pay the whistleblowers $60,000 and take other corrective actions.

"Filing a baseless, retaliatory lawsuit against workers who engaged in protected activity has a profound, chilling effect," said Marthe Kent, OSHA's New England regional administrator.

"It can intimidate workers into remaining silent about safety and health concerns that could have consequences for them and others on the road."

The order comes on the heels of an OSHA investigation, which determined that the company violated the whistleblower-protection provisions of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act when it filed a lawsuit against two former workers – a mechanic and a driver – who had registered complaints about a potentially unsafe truck with the North Branford Police Department and the Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles in September 2012.

While the workers were discharged from employment for reasons unrelated to their protected activities, according to OSHA, the company subsequently filed a lawsuit against the two workers in the Superior Court of Connecticut on Jan. 7, 2013, alleging that they intentionally and maliciously filed the complaint with the North Branford Police Department.

In addition to ordering the withdrawal of the lawsuit, the order requires Palumbo to pay each worker $20,000 in punitive damages for the filing and litigating of a lawsuit that was solely intended to retaliate against activities protected by the Surface Transportation Assistance Act, as well as $10,000 each in compensatory damages for mental anguish, emotional distress, pain and suffering.

Additionally, the company must pay reasonable attorneys' fees to the complainants, provide the former workers a neutral job reference and post a notice on its job site and provide fact sheets to its workers notifying them of their rights under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act.

The company or the complainants can file objections or request a hearing before the department's Office of Administrative Law Judges within 30 days of receipt of OSHA's order.

Sponsored Recommendations

Elevating Safety: Empowering Supervisors to Become Safety Advocates

Aug. 27, 2024
Explore the skills, knowledge and techniques that supervisors need to effectively manage the safety of their crew. This guide will examine the causes and symptoms of supervisory...

Top 10 Causes of Distracted Driving—and What They All Have in Common

Aug. 27, 2024
The results reveal the top ten causes of distracted driving, and make it clear that not all distractions are created equal.

Providing the Best PPE is No Guarantee

Aug. 27, 2024
Advancements in PPE are impressive—better protection, comfort and style. But even if you’ve provided the best PPE, there is no guarantee it will be worn.

6 Qualities That Make a Safety Leader

Aug. 27, 2024
A strong safety culture depends on dedicated leaders. They are the people who spearhead the fight for a safer work environment. A good safety leader isn’t shy about bringing concerns...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!