Image

Failure to Correct Hazards Adds $131,000 to the OSHA Tab of NY Manufacturing Plant

Dec. 11, 2013
Uncorrected and recurring hazards at a Wordingham Machine Co., a Victor, N.Y.-based manufacturing plant, result in $131,600 in additional OSHA fines.

The failure of a Victor, N.Y.-based optical equipment manufacturer to correct serious safety hazards has resulted in $131,600 in additional fines from OSHA and a tongue-lashing from OSHA’s area director.

“Employers must understand that they cannot ignore their responsibility to provide safe working conditions for their employees and to correct hazards when identified. Ignoring OSHA citations means that employees remain at risk of serious injury or even death,” said Christopher Adams, OSHA’s area director in Syracuse. “These large, additional fines are the direct result of this employer’s lack of action.”

OSHA’s Syracuse Area Office first cited Wordingham Machine Co. in March 2013 for seven violations of workplace safety standards at the company’s 580 Fishers Station Drive manufacturing plant. OSHA proposed $16,100 in fines for those violations.

OSHA began a follow-up inspection in June 2013 after the company failed to respond to the citations or submit proof that it had corrected the cited hazards. The follow-up inspection found that six specific hazards remained uncorrected. These include unguarded moving machine parts; no procedures to prevent the unintended startup of machinery during maintenance; unapproved use of electrical equipment; excess pressure for a compressed air hose used for cleaning; and not providing workers with fire extinguisher training.

These conditions resulted in OSHA issuing six failure-to-abate notifications to Wordingham, with $126,000 in fines. OSHA also issued a repeat citation, carrying a $5,600 fine, for a locked exit door, a condition similar to one that had been cited in the previous inspection.

A failure-to-abate notice applies to a condition, hazard or practice for which the employer was originally cited and, upon reinspection, was found uncorrected. A repeat violation exists when an employer has been cited previously for the same or a similar violation of a standard, regulation, rule or order at any of its facilities in federal enforcement states within the last five years.

Wordingham Machine has 15 business days from receipt of its latest citations and proposed penalties to comply, meet with Adams or contest the findings before the independent Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

About the Author

Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is the former content director of EHS Today, and is currently the EHSQ content & community lead at Intelex Technologies Inc. She has written about occupational safety and health and environmental issues since 1990.

Sponsored Recommendations

April 25, 2025
Environmental audits should be a core part of your EHS program regardless of whether you choose to pursue ISO 14001 certification.
April 25, 2025
Streamline EHS inspections. Conduct, track, and manage inspections effortlessly with customizable checklists, real-time reporting, and actionable insights.
April 25, 2025
A winning business case is based on the ROI of the project. The essential first step is determining your EHS costs today.
April 25, 2025
The use of QR codes can greatly simplify observation, near miss, and incident reporting and improve the quantity and quality of data. The more safety information that is collected...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of EHS Today, create an account today!